From helbig at Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE Wed May 2 08:19:20 2001 From: helbig at Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE (Wolfgang Helbig) Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 00:19:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [pups] missing V6 Docs Message-ID: <200105012219.f41MJKa23332@RVC1.Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE> Hi, In "SETTING UP UNIX - Sixth Edition" some documents are mentioned that are not in the V6 distribution (v6doc in from Dennis or the corresponding part of the tape from Ken Wellsch). These are: (numbers from the cover page) 10. NROFF Users' Manual 12. A Manual for the Tmg compiler-writing Language 14. The M6 Macro Processor 15. A System for Typewriting Mathematics 16. DC - An interactive desk calculator Does anyone know, why these docs were not included in the distribution if they are somewhere on minnies disks? I am only searching for the V6 docs, not V7, where these files were distributed. Just curious. Wolfgang Received: (from major at localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA60328 for pups-liszt; Wed, 2 May 2001 09:16:53 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from owner-pups at minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au) From iking at microsoft.com Wed May 2 09:06:28 2001 From: iking at microsoft.com (Ian King) Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:06:28 -0700 Subject: [pups] missing V6 Docs Message-ID: <8D25F244B8274141B5D313CA4823F39C018EEE43@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> I recall stumbling across them in an odd place in Ken Wellsch's distribution. I'll try to remember to look when I get home (it's on my PDP-11) and send another mail -- Ian -----Original Message----- From: Wolfgang Helbig [mailto:helbig at Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:19 PM To: pups at minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Subject: [pups] missing V6 Docs Hi, In "SETTING UP UNIX - Sixth Edition" some documents are mentioned that are not in the V6 distribution (v6doc in from Dennis or the corresponding part of the tape from Ken Wellsch). These are: (numbers from the cover page) 10. NROFF Users' Manual 12. A Manual for the Tmg compiler-writing Language 14. The M6 Macro Processor 15. A System for Typewriting Mathematics 16. DC - An interactive desk calculator Does anyone know, why these docs were not included in the distribution if they are somewhere on minnies disks? I am only searching for the V6 docs, not V7, where these files were distributed. Just curious. Wolfgang From wkt at henry.cs.adfa.edu.au Thu May 3 12:19:49 2001 From: wkt at henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (Warren Toomey) Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 12:19:49 +1000 (EST) Subject: [pups] Change of PUPS list address Message-ID: <200105030219.f432Jnl10761@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> All, The machine which hosts the pups mailing list, minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au, is going to change its domain name in mid-July. To help alleviate any problems, I have taken out a separate domain, and have put in aliases to the current minnie address, and will migrate the aliases to the new address when the time comes. So, if possible could you send e-mail to the pups mailing list using the address pups at tuhs.org from now on. Thanks, Warren Toomey wkt at tuhs.org From Fred.van.Kempen at microwalt.nl Wed May 9 01:04:16 2001 From: Fred.van.Kempen at microwalt.nl (Fred N. van Kempen) Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 17:04:16 +0200 Subject: [pups] John Wilson / DBit offline Message-ID: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC3020BB6@mwnt4.microwalt.nl> Hi all, In case you're trying to get a hold of John Wilson, or were going to look at his web site... no go. Due to a fairly serious ISP, uhh, "issue", his machine died on him. I talked to him last night, and he was going to see if he could revive his (co-lo) machine, or would have to install a new one. Cheers, Fred -- Fred N. van Kempen Fred.van.Kempen at MicroWalt.NL Microsoft MCSE+I/MCSE/MCSD Compaq ASE/ACT UNIX Systems Programmer Cisco ACRC/CCDA/CCNA/SupportPro InterNetworking en Network Security Consultant MicroWalt Corporation (Netherlands), Korte Heul 95, 1403 ND BUSSUM Phone +31 (35) 6980059 FAX +31 (35) 6980215 http://WWW.MicroWalt.NL/ Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding aan derden is niet toegestaan. Er wordt geen verantwoordelijkheid genomen voor de juiste en volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van dit bericht, noch voor de tijdige ontvangst ervan. From jstevep at tron.superglobalmegacorp.com Thu May 17 12:31:48 2001 From: jstevep at tron.superglobalmegacorp.com (PUP) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 21:31:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: [pups] BSD 2.11 SL/IP and sim2.3d+BB1 Message-ID: <200105170231.f4H2VmO23175@tron.superglobalmegacorp.com> I know that there must be some setup guides for BSD2.11 still floating around there, but I have not been able to find anything.. Here is what I am trying to do: I noticed that the sim2.3d+BB1 emulator will allow you to connect Unix "devices" to the DL1 lines. I set it to connect the serial port on my Linux box, and connected a IBM 3151 (VT100 like terminal), and it worked great! Taking this a step further, I took the serial port and moved it to my Cisco router (the aux port).. I have been trying to configure SL/IP on it.. I first setup my Linux box to connect to the router via slip so that I can verify my cisco config. I am having trouble on the BSD side.. As far as I can tell it is not routing replys over the sl0 interface.. (Or the emulator is cooking the serial data...) A final test I tried to connect to copies of sim2.3d+BB1 via pty's.. same thing. The good part is when you try to telnet from the router, you can see the socket accept on the BSD side.. The BSD box seems not to reply.. Additionally I saw some stuff on increasing the size of CBLOCK in param.h (my default was 32, I tried 64), which seemed to have no effect. I started SL/IP by running slattach ttyl1 9600 then ifconfig sl0 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 up by default as this I can't ping the 10.1.1.1 (my side).. so I added a route route add 10.1.1.1 127.0.0.1 0 I don't know if I have to do this... Oh the image that I'm using is the 2.11_rp_unknown from the archive.. (It has a note that it is patch level 400.) Also the person that maintains BSD 2.11's site is down.. bummer.. Sorry for the rambling! Received: (from major at localhost) by minnie.tuhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA96454 for pups-liszt; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:04:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from owner-pups at minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au) From sms at moe.2bsd.com Thu May 17 13:52:31 2001 From: sms at moe.2bsd.com (Steven M. Schultz) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 20:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [pups] BSD 2.11 SL/IP and sim2.3d+BB1 Message-ID: <200105170352.f4H3qVx16950@moe.2bsd.com> > From: PUP I've taken the liberty of adding <\n> characters - something about 1k character lines bugs me ;) > I know that there must be some setup guides for BSD2.11 still floating > around there, but I have not been able to find anything.. Here is what I /usr/doc/2.10/setup.2.11 bit of a misnomer and it's a long enough story I won't bother anyone with the details. That's the raw troff sources though. If it's the formatted version that is wanted there should be a copy in the 2.11 portion of the PUPS/TUHS section of the archive. It shows up at PDP-11/Distributions/ucb/2.11BSD and there are also complete tarballs and a dump of the root filesystem all at rev level 431. It should be a simple matter of putting the bits on tape/disk (using the makesimtape or similar utility provided with the emulator being used). At that point the normal 2.11 installation process can be followed - there have only been 5 updates since then (432 thru 436) so catching up wouldn't be hard at all. > I noticed that the sim2.3d+BB1 emulator will allow you to connect Unix > "devices" to the DL1 lines. I set it to connect the serial port on my Linux > box, and connected a IBM 3151 (VT100 like terminal), and it worked great! Probably doing 7E1 and just about anything would work with that ;) > Taking this a step further, I took the serial port and moved it to my Cisco > router (the aux port).. I have been trying to configure SL/IP on it.. That'll definitely require a 'raw' or 8bit clean path and I don't know if the sim2.3d does that or not - never tried it. The stock sim2.3d doesn't appear to have extra serial line support - or if it does it isn't obvious. Perhaps that is what the BB1 part is about. > I first setup my Linux box to connect to the router via slip so that I can > verify my cisco config. I am having trouble on the BSD side.. As far as I > can tell it is not routing replys over the sl0 interface.. (Or the emulator > is cooking the serial data...) That's a real possibility. The 'slattach' command on the 11 side will take care of setting all the modes so that an 8bit path is obtained. If the emulator is stripping the parity bit (which wouldn't show up in the normal "hook a terminal up" test) then SL/IP will obviously have problems. You might have better luck with the Begemot emulator P11. No need for SL/IP since P11 has an emulated DEQNA ethernet driver. > A final test I tried to connect to copies of sim2.3d+BB1 via pty's.. same > thing. The good part is when you try to telnet from the router, you can see > the socket accept on the BSD side.. The BSD box seems not to reply.. > Additionally I saw some stuff on increasing the size of CBLOCK in param.h > (my default was 32, I tried 64), which seemed to have no effect. I'd not muck about with CBLOCK - it doesn't really buy much and from the sounds of things aren't getting anywhere near the conditions that comment was aimed at. > I started SL/IP by running > slattach ttyl1 9600 > then > ifconfig sl0 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 up That should be all that's necessary > by default as this I can't ping the 10.1.1.1 (my side).. so I added a route > > route add 10.1.1.1 127.0.0.1 0 > I don't know if I have to do this... You shouldn't have to do that because in /etc/netstart, if things are set up right you would have: slattach ttyl1 9600 ifconfig sl0 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 up route add $hostname localhost 0 route add default $default 1 So if 'hostname' and 'default' are set at the top of the file all the routing is all set to go. Just make sure that 'ifconfig sl0' happens before 'ifconfig lo0 ...'. Also, by default the C library is compiled to use DNS resolver routines so it will likely be necessary to use a combination of numeric IP addresses and entries in /etc/hosts > Oh the image that I'm using is the 2.11_rp_unknown from the archive.. > (It has a note that it is patch level 400.) That is fairly old, but SL/IP hasn't changed since the system came out eons ago. > Also the person that maintains BSD 2.11's site is down.. bummer.. It has _never_ been down except for a reboot the other day to install another 512MB of memory a week or so ago. With a 1400VA UPS the system can ride out most of the power problems California's having. If the FTP site here is unreachable you might try going to the mirror at FTP.TO.GD-ES.COM - all the updates are in /pub/2.11BSD Steven Schultz sms at moe.2bsd.com Received: (from major at localhost) by minnie.tuhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA96508 for pups-liszt; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:11:44 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from owner-pups at minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au) From wkt at henry.cs.adfa.edu.au Thu May 17 14:00:06 2001 From: wkt at henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (Warren Toomey) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:00:06 +1000 (EST) Subject: [pups] BSD 2.11 SL/IP and sim2.3d+BB1 In-Reply-To: <200105170352.f4H3qVx16950@moe.2bsd.com> from "Steven M. Schultz" at "May 16, 2001 08:52:31 pm" Message-ID: <200105170400.f4H406m51958@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> In article by Steven M. Schultz: >> I noticed that the sim2.3d+BB1 emulator will allow you to connect Unix >> "devices" to the DL1 lines. I set it to connect the serial port on my Linux >> box, and connected a IBM 3151 (VT100 like terminal), and it worked great! > > Probably doing 7E1 and just about anything would work with that ;) > > > Taking this a step further, I took the serial port and moved it to my Cisco > > router (the aux port).. I have been trying to configure SL/IP on it.. > > That'll definitely require a 'raw' or 8bit clean path and I don't know > if the sim2.3d does that or not - never tried it. The stock sim2.3d > doesn't appear to have extra serial line support - or if it does it > isn't obvious. Perhaps that is what the BB1 part is about. I can confirm that sim2.3d is not 8-bit clean on output. I got bitten on this when working on Vtserver, and I tore my hair out for a whole day. 443c449 < if ((temp = sim_putchar (tto_unit.buf & 0177)) != SCPE_OK) return temp; --- > if ((temp = sim_putchar (tto_unit.buf)) != SCPE_OK) return temp; It is 8-bit clean on input. Warren Received: (from major at localhost) by minnie.tuhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA97320 for pups-liszt; Thu, 17 May 2001 17:04:28 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from owner-pups at minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au) From jstevep at tron.superglobalmegacorp.com Thu May 17 17:37:56 2001 From: jstevep at tron.superglobalmegacorp.com (PUP) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 02:37:56 -0500 (EST) Subject: [pups] BSD 2.11 SL/IP and sim2.3d+BB1 Message-ID: <200105170737.f4H7buK16947@tron.superglobalmegacorp.com> Thanks for the pointer, I found the part you mentioned for the ASCII clean up and removed them from the DL11 and KL11 drivers, and noticed that I need to detect the 0 device so the console is usable =) but the big thing is that I telneted into the VM using slip ok!!!! Thanks again, I didn't know what to look for in the source (I was looking @ the other half in the attach stuff not I/O (doh!)) If you want/need I'll gladly diff mine out... Oh btw Steven, every time I try to ftp the site, I get connection closed.. It 's definatly "up" but I can't get to it.. does your site try to reverse lookup clients? if so, that's the issue.. I don't have reverse entries for dns. Thanks again!