comp.sources.reviewed -> comp.sources.posix

[Paul Eggert]

wht (Warren Tucker) writes:

	UNIX C and shell scripts, VMS C and shell scripts, Perl
	scripts, awk scripts, MSDOS C, assembler and Pascal, X11
	bitmaps, FORTRAN, Amiga C, standalone man pages ...  Many/most
	of these have no POSIX applicability; let's not exclude 90% of
	reality from the comp.sources."new-thang"

Posix excludes little of what you mention; it's a broad umbrella, or
soon will be.  As for the rest, surely X applications should be posted
in comp.sources.x?  And surely Amiga-specific stuff should be posted in
comp.sources.amiga, and similarly for other vendor-specific stuff like
assembler?

Will comp.sources.reviewed publish programs that don't conform to Posix
but could easily be made to?  I hope not -- it'd mean the reviewers
weren't doing their job.