NFS ID mapping (was: cpio - segmentation violation)
Doug Gwyn
gwyn at smoke.BRL.MIL
Wed Jun 28 13:59:31 AEST 1989
In article <1839 at auspex.auspex.com> guy at auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes:
>I suspect future SunOS releases, and the NFS source releases derived
>from them, will follow 4.xBSD and S5 and have unsigned UIDs ...
Great, the negative IDs were a hassle.
>Separate issue(s): 1) RFS-style mapping has, I think, been implemented
>by Cray, and 2) RFS also has, I think, the same notion of a "nobody" UID.
Given a choice between the Yellow Pages and RFS approaches to ID mapping,
I much prefer the RFS style. Rather than adopt Yellow Pages here when we
first installed NFS, we tossed YP and instead went to a "campus-wide"
global UID scheme. I'm not recommending that, but it shows what low
regard some sites had for YP.
I don't claim to be an expert, I just watched this stuff happen.
More information about the Comp.bugs.4bsd.ucb-fixes
mailing list