More on pointers/arrays: Function Arguments
Dave Brownell
brownell at harvard.UUCP
Wed Apr 11 01:18:38 AEST 1984
I saw this gem in a recent book on C programming by Thomas Plum,
"Learning to Program in C". (It's much more tutorial than K&R;
I'm told it's very understandable, but my only exposure to it
is answering a few questions.)
char *index (s, c)
char s [], c;
{
while (*s != '\0' && *s != c)
++s; /* AARGH!! */
return (*s == c ? s : NULL);
}
This passes through Berkeley CC and LINT unscathed, and compiles.
Yet K&R Appendix A Section 14.3 Sentence 2 (sound biblical?) says
"...arrays are not lvalues" and Section 7.2 clearly states
autoincrement as "++ lvalue". Hmmm ...
Dave Brownell
{genrad|allegra|ihnp4|ima|amd70}!wjh12!sequoia!brownell
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list