> Speaking of ^^ and ==== (?!), I always wondered why C didn't have &&= and
> ||= (with the obvious semantics).
> James Jones
&= and |= are sufficient already. Remember ... C doesn't really
have booleans.
--
-- Peter Lee
...{ucbvax!amd,decwrl,ihnp4}!nsc!daisy!pkl
[No news is good news]