integer *= float; Re: superstiti - (nf)
edhall at randvax.UUCP
edhall at randvax.UUCP
Sat Jan 21 20:45:28 AEST 1984
---------------------------------
I had no difficulty figuring out what the result *should* be. The
C Programming Language seemed pretty clear, both in the text and
in the reference manual. My confidence was a bit shaken when I
found the problem in the Ritchie compiler (which I sort of took
as a `standard'), but as Dennis Ritchie's article said, this was
an oversight that since has been corrected.
All in all, I find C to be internally consistant, such that a new
(to me) construct `looks right' or `looks wrong' without my having
to look in the reference manual and see. That's the beauty of
`one-person' languages, as opposed to committee efforts. Warts
and all, at least it's only one person's viewpoint to get used to.
-Ed Hall
decvax!randvax!edhall (UUCP)
edhall at rand-unix (ARPA)
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list