C declarations

[Stanley Friesen]

I think the article by jsdy at SEISMO is generally good, and clarifies
a major confusion, but I disagree on one minor point.

In article <8302 at brl-tgr.ARPA> jsdy at SEISMO.ARPA writes:
>
>An array (int ia[N];) is actually N real objects of the type of which
>you have the array.  (Did I say that right?)  So, in this case, if
>N == 4, then I have just reserved space for 4 int's.  The real objects
>that exist, here, are ia[0], ia[1], ia[2], and ia[3].  The symbol "ia"
>here refers to no single existing object.
>
>So, now comes the confusing part.  "Ia" doesn't refer to any existing
>object -- so, for instance, an attempt to say:
>	ia = new_value;
>gets an error from C.  But if we use "ia" as a pure value, it appears
>to have a value which is the address of the first element of the array
>(often put, "the address of the array").  We can then do pointer arith-
>metic with this value!  In this way, it  a p p e a r s  to be (but is
>not) a pointer.

	I say "ia" *is* a pointer, a pointer *constant*, with the
same relation to a pointer variable as an integer constant has to
an integer varible. This way the basis for both the similarities
*and* differences between "int ia[n]" and "int *ip" are explained.
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

{trwrb|allegra|cbosgd|hplabs|ihnp4|aero!uscvax!akgua}!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
 or
quad1!psivax!friesen