SIZEOF

[Jim Crandell]

> Even given K&R, with its cavalier approach toward formal specification,
> this is not a reasonable interpretation, because the above paragraph says
> "integer", not "int", and a pointer can't be the same size as a char,
> a short, an int, and a long all at the same time.

Unless, of course, char, short, int and long int are all the same, which
K&R also fails to proscribe.
-- 

    Jim Crandell, C. S. Dept., The University of Texas at Austin
               {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!crandell