Language transitions
The Sherif "Matt D."
dillon at ucbvax.ARPA
Thu Jan 31 06:50:59 AEST 1985
The problem I see between Pascal and C is not that Pascal is
so much worse than C (It is), But that many of us are forced to use
languages we don't like just because So and So over that'a'way used Fortran
all his life. I don't mind Pascal as long as I don't have to program in
it.
One reason new (and better) languages are not catching on as quickly
is due to the latter cause. I take as fact that better languages are
comming out these days and days to come, and as soon as I can get my hands
on them, I'll check them out. But people have different preferences, so
one language may suit them better than another. For instance, I cannot
stand the Apple MAC, because it does not allow me enough freedom with
the computer. Incidently, this is why I don't like Pascal.
One argument against C that I have heard A LOT is that it isn't
structured or that it's hard to program readable code in C. This is a
bunch of B*LL. The fact is that who-ever said that either does not
or has not programmed in C, or saw a bunch of Joe-Code by some-one-else
who wasn't a very good programmer.
The general objection to Pascal by C programmers is that it is
not powerfull enough, or fast enough. Alternatively, Pascal programmers
see C as such a change, that it's unreadable to them.
My opinion on Pascal (And this may inspire a mail war), is that
it is a subset of C, period.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list