The wonders of C (=/==)
Bopsi ChandraMouli
mouli at cavell.UUCP
Fri Mar 29 11:02:29 AEST 1985
In article <1401 at ut-sally.UUCP> riddle at ut-sally.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle) writes:
>> It seems to me that the normally-cited "save keystrokes" reason for
>> the =/== choice cannot be correct...
>
>Wasn't "==" chosen for its obvious analogy to "!=", "<=", and ">=" ?
>That's what I've always assumed, at least.
The "obvious" analogy goes like this. :=)
<= -- less than OR equal
>= -- Greater than OR equal
!= -- not OR equal (not quite right!)
== -- equal OR equal
or more appropriately
assign OR assign
---------------------------------------
ihnp4!alberta!cavell!mouli
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list