fast code and no morals

rex ballard rb at ccivax.UUCP
Sat Feb 1 12:02:00 AEST 1986


In article <651 at brl-smoke.ARPA> ron at brl-smoke.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>) writes:
>>> So what?  This can be written "structured" ...
>> Sure is recommended if you are optimizing for speed
>If you are going to blast away at all the good features of a high level
>language for the sake of speed, why don't you just program in assembler?

Assembler isn't portable, C is.

Since C is not sensitive to newlines that often, additional comments
could be added.



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list