fast code and no morals
Ron Natalie <ron>
ron at brl-smoke.ARPA
Tue Jan 28 16:36:59 AEST 1986
> > So what? This can be written "structured", and would be more
> > maintainable if it were. Surely this is not an example of
> > recommended practice?
>
> Sure is recommended if you are optimizing for speed, which is what I assume
> is being done here. Since calloc is part of the system, and is assumed to
> not have to be changed, maintainability is not the question. Speed is the
> answer.
>
If you are going to blast away at all the good features of a high level
language for the sake of speed, why don't you just program in assembler?
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list