PRECEDENT FOR USE OF =
Dave Haynie
daveh at cbmvax.cbm.UUCP
Thu Jul 3 03:17:49 AEST 1986
> Quick Jab:
> If Pascal is so good why did its author (N. Wirth) write
> two other languages (Modula & Modula II) before deciding he had one
> which could be used for system implementation? (Lilith (sp?))
>
> Bill Bogstad
> bogstad at hopkins-eecs-bravo.arpa
Never any question about this one. Wirth designed Pascal as a teaching
language, not a system implementation language, and as a language that
could be easily compiled by a 1-pass compiler on small computers. It
was designed specifically to be used by novices, thus the very strong
type-checking, bounds checking, etc., and the very limited power of
the language. Modula 2 seems like and attempt to create a spin-off of
the Pascal methodology that can actually be used for system implementation
and the like. Probably just as reasonable as all the incompatibly-expanded
Pascals around today.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Dave Haynie {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh
A quote usually goes here, but its currently being rennovated.
These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they be yours too.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list