Compiler Specific Operators
tainter at ihlpg.UUCP
tainter at ihlpg.UUCP
Wed Jul 16 07:01:00 AEST 1986
> >In article <mit-eddi.2526> barmar at mit-eddie.UUCP (Barry Margolin) writes:
> >>...why not write the operations as function calls, and teach compilers
> >>to open-code calls to certain functions.
>
> In article <503 at cubsvax.UUCP> peters at cubsvax.UUCP (Peter S. Shenkin) replies:
> >Yes; I tried to send off a similar comment on the original posting, but
> >it never made it off site. What I'd like to know is whether the draft
> >standard permits this, and what the net guru's think about it.
> >
> >In Chris Torek's comment on the original posting, he proposes a workaround
> >permitted by the draft ANSI, and notes that it is bug-prone. If this means
> >that the draft standard doesn't permit "function calls" to be implemented
> >otherwise, I'm curious what the objections are to this practice.
>
> Actually, the workaround comes off as being recommended by the
> draft standard, at least to me. I am not certain it is bug-prone,
> but it sure does `feel' odd.
>
> Apparently the committee (or a large faction thereof) is quite
> concerned about ensuring that there is some easy way to ensure a
> `real function call'. They want a standardised way of defeating
> in-line expansion, and have, at least for the nonce, settled upon
> `#undef funcname'. A `#pragma' seems to me to be at least as good
> an idea; compilers that never open-code a function call can ignore
> this, while those that might perform this optimisation could be
> required to pay attention to at least this one pragma. Then instead
> of
>
> #include <math.h>
> #undef sin /* make sure we get a function */
> ...
>
> we might have
>
> #include <math.h>
> #pragma disable_inline(sin) /* get a function */
> ...
> #pragma enable_inline(sin) /* back to possible inline */
> ...
> #pragma disable_inline(sin) /* back to function */
>
> This has the advantage of being reversible, as well.
> --
> In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 1516)
> UUCP: seismo!umcp-cs!chris
> CSNet: chris at umcp-cs ARPA: chris at mimsy.umd.edu
Has anyoe proposed :
#suspend alpha
#restore alpha
to allow temporary suspension of a macro.
#undef
would mean multiple defines to restore the macro, which could be a pain
to maintain, or imposes some odd coding conventions
--j.a.tainter
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list