code optimizers (was Re: induction
mccaugh at uiucdcsm.UUCP
mccaugh at uiucdcsm.UUCP
Sat Feb 21 15:53:00 AEST 1987
Just for the record:
1) Having extensively used FTN-IV-G along with assembler programs, I can
safely say that the "G" version was not the "optimized" FORTRAN;
2) On the other hand, the "H" version was definitely optimized: unlike
many compilers of its vintage (which were very memory-conscious), the
"H"-optimizer bothered to keep the entire parse-tree intact for optimi-
zation, which accounts for its particular success as a FTN-optimizer
(the more info at your disposal -- even at the expense of memory -- the
better position you are in to generate "optimal" code). For more details,
consult "Compiler Construction for Digital Computers" by David Gries (2nd
edition -- most readable if you speak IBM-360).
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list