C Style
00704a-Liber
nevin1 at ihlpf.ATT.COM
Wed Apr 27 09:58:53 AEST 1988
In article <364 at m3.mfci.UUCP> karzes at mfci.UUCP (Tom Karzes) writes:
>TRUE should have the same type and value as the constant expression (0 == 0).
>Similarly, FALSE should have the same type and value as the constant
>expression (0 != 0). This principle holds for any language. In the case
>of C, TRUE and FALSE are signed 1 and signed 0, resp.
Since when does this principle hold for any language?? Take Fortran, for
instance. If I remember correctly, odd numbers were TRUE and even numbers
were FALSE (or vice-versa; it's really been a long time since I used
FORTRAN), since compilers were required to look at only the least
significant bit when checking for true/false values. (This may have been
changed for F77; I'm not sure.)
There are many other examples I could cite (Icon, LISP, etc.). Your
principle only holds for languages which
a) Have a boolean type
and
b) All logical operations result in that boolean type
such as Pascal. Many (most?) languages do not conform to these
requirements.
--
_ __ NEVIN J. LIBER ..!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1 (312) 510-6194
' ) ) "The secret compartment of my ring I fill
/ / _ , __o ____ with an Underdog super-energy pill."
/ (_</_\/ <__/ / <_ These are solely MY opinions, not AT&T's, blah blah blah
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list