No gotos in Bourne shell (DCL ?? [ecch])
Ozan Yigit
oz at yunexus.UUCP
Wed Apr 20 14:22:33 AEST 1988
In article <2592 at ttrdc.UUCP> levy at ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) writes:
>
>It is also "amusing" to "note" that DEC has done right well with its DCL which
>has yet to support a loop constructor of any kind other than GOTO. VMS? I
>hear you say? What's THAT?!?!?
>
This above must be a massive joke. You obviously have never used
DCL!! A year after starting to suffer DCL-Goto-pain-in-the-rear
[even prep-h did not help], I adopted a C version of ratfor
translator on top of DCL (A later version of that translator was
posted to comp.sources.unix... it should take you about a day to
make it generate DCL... try it :-)), so we can be rid of GOTOs.
That was 5 years ago. DEC's VMS/DCL brain-damage was probably the
most backward thing ever inflicted [in the name of RSX11
compatibility no less] on computing professionals. [But than,
that is DEC... they wrote a stream-oriented programmable filter
language, and when I asked its designers about AWK, I got blank
stares... They did not know what it was...]
Yes... This is *very amusing* !!!
oz
--
... and they will all Usenet: [decvax|ihnp4]!utzoo!yunexus!oz
bite the dust ... .......!uunet!mnetor!yunexus!oz
comprehensively. ... Bitnet: oz@[yusol|yulibra|yuyetti]
Archbishop Tutu Phonet: +1 416 736-5257 x 3976
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list