ANSI rationale has possibly garbled line

[Dave Sill]

Larry Cipriani writes:
>On page 53 of the rationale (or is that rationalization?) the
>first sentence of 3.5.3.1 says "A pointer declarator may NOW its
>own type qualifiers, to specify the ..." (emphasis mine). This
>seems messed up, any ideas for what the correct wording is?

How about:
"A pointer declarator may now HAVE its own type qualifiers..."

[Based on October '86 wording.]

=========
The opinions expressed above are mine.

"PostScript is the new ASCII."
					-- Bill Joy