cdecl keyword

Ray Dunn ray at micomvax.UUCP
Fri Apr 22 12:03:23 AEST 1988


In article <7682 at brl-smoke.ARPA> (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>In article <982 at micomvax.UUCP> ray at micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) writes:
>>What do you suggest as an alternative?  To put the onus on the *other*
>>languages?  Sure, that is possible, but who says 'C' has to be the reference
>>language?
>
>Your entire response shows that you missed what I was saying.
>

Your entire response shows that you missed what I was saying.

Your pointed (:-) reply does not quote my posting which it is supposed to be
rebutting, I presume because most of the points in it are not rebutted.

>Point 4: My home computer uses a scheme exactly as I have described; it
>	even has a segmented architecture.  Don't accuse me of lack of
>	experience!

Tch.  Tch.  Doug.  Now we are in fantasy land.  This is a fine example of
going off at half cock, as in the recent "goto's" fiasco.

I will pay a handsome reward to the first person who can point out any
accusation of lack of *experience* in my posting.

I wonder what an analyst of Freudian bent would make of all of this?

Followups, perhaps, to alt.flame.

Ray Dunn.  ..{philabs, mnetor}!micomvax!ray



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list