cdecl keyword
Ray Dunn
ray at micomvax.UUCP
Fri Apr 22 12:03:23 AEST 1988
In article <7682 at brl-smoke.ARPA> (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>In article <982 at micomvax.UUCP> ray at micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) writes:
>>What do you suggest as an alternative? To put the onus on the *other*
>>languages? Sure, that is possible, but who says 'C' has to be the reference
>>language?
>
>Your entire response shows that you missed what I was saying.
>
Your entire response shows that you missed what I was saying.
Your pointed (:-) reply does not quote my posting which it is supposed to be
rebutting, I presume because most of the points in it are not rebutted.
>Point 4: My home computer uses a scheme exactly as I have described; it
> even has a segmented architecture. Don't accuse me of lack of
> experience!
Tch. Tch. Doug. Now we are in fantasy land. This is a fine example of
going off at half cock, as in the recent "goto's" fiasco.
I will pay a handsome reward to the first person who can point out any
accusation of lack of *experience* in my posting.
I wonder what an analyst of Freudian bent would make of all of this?
Followups, perhaps, to alt.flame.
Ray Dunn. ..{philabs, mnetor}!micomvax!ray
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list