a couple of random questions

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <165600037 at uiucdcsb> kenny at uiucdcsb.cs.uiuc.edu writes:
>Doug, did you ever submit the change request on the consideration that
>I outlined in the last paragraph?

I honestly don't recall at this point.
The current dpANS says that fseek() returns 0 for an "improper request"
but doesn't say what that consists of.  I think it's within the rights
of an implementation to say that seeking past EOF is "improper".