alloca wars
Scott Wilson
swilson%thetone at Sun.COM
Thu Aug 4 10:23:27 AEST 1988
Oh gosh, I'm sorry I ever brought up alloca. The original post
was in response to the portability issue, so let me see if we
agree on this:
1.) Code that, in general, makes use of features that are less available
than others is, in general, less portable.
2.) Alloca is less available than malloc/free.
3.) Therefore, all other things equal, code that uses alloca is less
portable than code that doesn't.
Does this make sense?
--
Scott Wilson arpa: swilson at sun.com "Why do dogs lick
Sun Microsystems uucp: ...!sun!swilson their balls? Because
Mt. View, CA they can!"
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list