Syntax of function prototypes...

[Karl Heuer]

In article <871 at buengc.BU.EDU> bph at buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>Am I missing something or is "int something();" just as good (for a
>prototype) (except for [style])?

You are missing something.  "int something();" is not a prototype; that word
is reserved for the new syntax.

Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl at haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint