*devaddr = 0 and volatile

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <14832 at mimsy.UUCP> chris at mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>I would suggest that the compiler complain about volatile references
>that it cannot compile `properly'.

Sounds like a reasonable suggestion to me.
After all, if the programmer specified "volatile" it is safe to
assume that he had a reason for doing so, and if it can't be honored
then something is probably going to break.