Noalias considered unreadable, let alone a bad idea
Benjamin G. Golding
jal at oliveb.olivetti.com
Thu Jan 28 02:00:58 AEST 1988
In article <583 at cresswell.quintus.UUCP>, ok at quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes:
> I have tried several times to read the description of 'noalias' that
> was posted here. I couldn't. Maybe it's just me, [...]
No, it's not just you - I am having just as much trouble.
I consider myself an average C programmer (some people will disagree
with this) and I tend to find myself writing less new code and
maintaining more that written by others; I seem to remember reading
that this is what most programmers do ("The Psychology of Computer
Programming" by Weinberg).
What I am worried about is changing someone else's code where they have
used "noalias" and inadvertantly creating a heck of a lot of trouble
for myself. When I add this to the fact that I am unlikely to ever use
this "feature," it just doesn't seem worth a damn thing. If you want
to do vectorisation, do it properly - don't just tag it onto an
existing language and lumber its users with the complexity.
Ben Golding.
Olivetti (Ivrea). ...!oliveb!icodap!taylor
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list