Are the criteria for Unix and PC compilers different?

[Ralf.Brown at B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU]

In article <1106 at silver.bacs.indiana.edu>, backstro at silver.bacs.indiana.edu (Dave White) writes:
}The PC compiler vendors broke down and developed support for arcane
}memory models -- even huge model, with arrays >64K bytes, which involve
}a subroutine call to handle pointer manipulation.  When will they
}realize that some of us really want the option of using 32-bit ints to
}port Unix-born code?  Yes, the code would be slow, but that'd be better
}than not having the resulting program run without weeks of debugging!
}--
}backstro at silver.bacs.indiana.edu

#define int long

Need I say more?

--
{harvard,ucbvax}!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!ralf -=-=- TalkNet: (412)268-3053 (school)
ARPA: RALF at B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU |"Tolerance means excusing the mistakes others make.
FIDO: Ralf Brown at 129/31 | Tact means not noticing them." --Arthur Schnitzler
BITnet: RALF%B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU at CMUCCVMA -=-=- DISCLAIMER? I claimed something?