In article <25652 at cca.CCA.COM> g-rh at CCA.CCA.COM.UUCP (Richard Harter) writes: >I don't know if this is what ANSI C expects, but it's not too hot if >it is, because we now have two descriptions of the calling sequence. Yes, but since a diagnostic is required for such a declaration mismatch, you get the opportunity to fix it before it's actually used.