A different view of volatile

Dr. T. Andrews tanner at ki4pv.uucp
Sat May 7 10:53:53 AEST 1988


In article <4651 at ihlpf.ATT.COM>, nevin1 at ihlpf.ATT.COM (he of the longish and often-seen .signature filled with bad cursive) writes:
) ... (ie, structs should not be allowed to be declared volatile), ...

Gee, thanks.  That de-values my new whiz-bang disk controller (the
one with the nice structure filled with device registers and ending
with a memory-mapped i/o buffer).
-- 
{allegra clyde!codas decvax!ucf-cs ihnp4!codas killer}!ki4pv!tanner



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list