Optimization (was Re: volatile)
Stephen J. Friedl
friedl at vsi.UUCP
Thu May 5 16:09:19 AEST 1988
In article <1025 at micomvax.UUCP>, ray at micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) writes:
< In article <2758 at bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi at bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
< >The sentiment behind this [deleted] rhetorical question is precisely
< >why it is dangerous that ANSI-conformant compilers will silently ignore
< >unrecognized #pragmas.
<
< What? Huh? I had almost fallen asleep hitting ^N, then this appeared!
<
< Dangerous indeed. Could this in fact not become the portability nightmare
< of the future, and is this perhaps something that we should try to nip in
< the bud as quickly as possible?
Sorry, no more buds will be nipped unless X3J11 decides to go
one more round with us ha ha ha ha :-).
Actually, I would imagine that most compilers would give some kind
of switch that turns on or turns off unreported #pragma warnings.
--
Steve Friedl V-Systems, Inc. (714) 545-6442 3B2-kind-of-guy
friedl at vsi.com {backbones}!vsi.com!friedl attmail!vsi!friedl
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list