0.1

[Dan Rice]

In article <13983 at mimsy.UUCP> chris at mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>If you want to get *really* ridiculous, 0.1 is irrational in irrational
>bases, but I am not sure those count :-) .  But Tom Neff is right (and
>I missed that error in my first followup).
>-- 
>In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
>Domain:	chris at mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris

	0.1 may have a non-repeating representation in some irrational bases,
but it is certainly rational regardless of how one chooses to write it...

-- 
- Dan Rice, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore PA 19081
  UUCP: ...!seismo!bpa!swatsun!rice, ...!sun!liberty!swatsun!rice
BITNET: rice%cs.swarthmore.edu at swarthmr.bitnet
 CSNET: rice at cs.swarthmore.edu