To a recent blathering on sizeof, I quote K&R, Appendix A, section 7.2,
   "Unary Operators":
       The construction  sizeof(type)  is taken to be a unit, so
       the expression  sizeof(type)-2  is the same as  (sizeof(type))-2.
John Hascall / ISU Comp Center
(am I the only one who reads this thing? :-)