Just Wondering
Chris Torek
chris at mimsy.UUCP
Thu Apr 27 19:31:42 AEST 1989
[I do not know why, but I cannot resist...]
>In some article whose referent was deleted by faulty news software,
>Rob at raksha.eng.ohio-state.edu (Rob Carriere) writes:
>>A trained English reader does not a trained C programmer make, nor
>>vice versa.
In article <1325 at ns.network.com> ddb at ns.network.com (David Dyer-Bennet) writes:
>Certainly not; however, both activities are performed using words and
>wordlike character groupings. I maintain that it is silly for the
>new upstart activity (programming) to establish rules that are in
>conflict with the rules of the old, established activity (reading).
>This only makes it harder to learn C programming, and causes lingering
>errors for years (or forever).
Clearly, then, if we are to make the language case-insensitive, it
should also be insensitive to alternative spellings for the same
word. For instance:
f()
{
int recognized;
...
recognised = token_is_ok();
After all, these mean the same thing.
--
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain: chris at mimsy.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list