TurboC 2.0 Prof vs uSoft C 5.1
Kevin Harris
kevin at cunixf.cc.columbia.edu
Wed Dec 20 02:15:31 AEST 1989
In article <5438.2583C869 at urchin.fidonet.org> Bob.Stout at p6.f506.n106.z1.fidonet.org (Bob Stout) writes:
>In an article of <9 Dec 89 04:34:39 GMT>, Scott_A_Dalrymple writes:
>
> >Pardon me for restarting a debate which has undoubtedly been fought
> >(probably to a draw) many times before. Which is better, MicroSoft
> >C 5.1 and Codeview or TC 2.0 Professional and Turbo Debugger?
>
>Since you already realize this is a religious issue, let's stick to known
>quantities... Even most Microsoft fans recognize that TD is the state of the
>art in compiler vendor debuggers. Which, of course, only means that the next
>release of CodeView will probably be better. But for right now, I suggest that
>your emphasis on debugging combined with the excellence of TD plus your
>already having been proselytized into the Borland IDE religion through the use
>of TP would argue strongly for your purchasing TC.
>
>As for me, I prefer Zortech...
I hereby register my vote for both TC 2.0 w/debugger and
MS-c 5.1 (althought I really like Codeview.) |->
|Kevin A. Harris |
|119th & Broadway; Rm. 212 -or- kevin at cunixf.cc.columbia.edu|
|New York, N.Y. 10027 ...!rutgers!columbia!cunixf!kevin|
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list