switch() difficulties in gcc v1.35

[Conor P. Cahill]

In article <18485 at netnews.upenn.edu>, weisen at eniac.seas.upenn.edu) (Neil I. Weisenfeld ;-) writes:
> Thanks to all those who gave me (non-obnoxious) replies to my posting.
> I didn't realize that gcc would interpret `defualt' in a case xxx: as
> a label if it hadn't been defined.  Is this non-ANSI C not to give an
> error for undefined and un-prototyped symbols.

How does one define or prototype a statement label?

Interpreting "defualt" as a statement label is correct in all versions of C.
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Conor P. Cahill     uunet!virtech!cpcahil      	703-430-9247	!
| Virtual Technologies Inc.,    P. O. Box 876,   Sterling, VA 22170     |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+