In article <7806 at chinet.chi.il.us>, les at chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) writes: > Does this imply that pointer math and subscripting of the returned > value is scaled by the size of the array? (i.e. would &flimflam + 1 > evaluate to the same address as flimflam + 20?) Yes. -- --Andrew Koenig ark at europa.att.com