pointers to arrays

[Guy Harris]

>>>	int flimflam[20];

...

>Does this imply that pointer math and subscripting of the returned
>value is scaled by the size of the array? (i.e. would &flimflam + 1
>evaluate to the same address as flimflam + 20?)

Yes.  That's how it works now; if you have

	int (*flimflamp)[20];

then

	flimflamp + 1

would typically point "20*sizeof (int)" bytes past where "flimflamp"
points, which is also where

	(*flimflamp) + 20

points ("*flimflamp" is an array-valued expression, and, in the (d)pANS
*and*, at least, in PCC-based pre-(d)pANS C implementations and possibly
other such implementations, is converted in that context to a pointer to
the first member of that array).