portability

[Miles Bader]

evil at arcturus.UUCP (Wade Guthrie) writes:
> In article <1354 at tank.uchicago.edu>, goer at sophist.uucp (Richard Goerwitz) writes:
> > QUESTION: What compiler for use under MS-DOS is the most portable?
> I have had a lot of luck with Microsoft C (not Quick-C, for which I can
> say nothing as I have not tried it).  It seems to be one of the richest
> versions of the language I have seen and it makes small, fast code.  You
> can certainly utilize its capabilities to write (expansive) code that
> is portable.

Assuming, of course, that you don't use one of the 437,889 microsoft
extensions to the language...

-Miles