Register control

Roy Browning Roy.Browning at f506.n106.z1.fidonet.org
Sun Jul 30 17:39:47 AEST 1989


Dumb Compiler/Intelligent Programmer    vs   Smart Compiler/Programmer

     Below is code I pruned from a working program and its assembly
dump.  Mark Williams version 4.0.12 was used which is considered a DUMB
compiler.  There is a total of 60 instructions, can a SMART compiler
reduce this number with the register definition removed?  I would
appreciate seeing such code produced and knowing the compiler capable of
accomplishing it.

     The reason I'm making this argument is that there is a third
option, a smart compiler that permits its defaults to be overridden by
the programmer.



        A vote for Smart Compilers and Intelligent Programmers,


                              Roy Browning




enum {
     zero,
     one
     } constants;

int  tabs;

char *outgoing,
     *buff_position;

int  expand = zero;

void
Registers()
{
     register char  *incoming,
                    *outgoingg;

     char *last_char;


     last_char = incoming;
     incoming = buff_position;
     outgoingg = outgoing;
     if (!expand) {
          for ( ; incoming <= last_char; incoming++, outgoingg++) {
               if (*incoming == '\n' && *(incoming-one) != '\r') {
                    *outgoingg++ = '\r';
                    *outgoingg = *incoming;
               } else {
                    *outgoingg = *incoming;
               }
          }
     } else {
          for ( ; incoming <= last_char; incoming++, outgoingg++) {
               if (*incoming == '\n' && *(incoming-one) != '\r') {
                    *outgoingg++ = '\r';
                    *outgoingg = *incoming;
               } else if (*incoming == '\t') {
                    outgoing = outgoingg;
                    ptabs(one);
                    outgoingg = --outgoing;
               } else {
                    *outgoingg = *incoming;
               }
          }
     }
     outgoing = outgoingg;
     buff_position = incoming--;

}

Registers_:
     push si
     push di
     push bp
     mov  bp, sp
     push ax
     mov  -2(bp), si
     mov  si, buff_position_
     mov  di, outgoing_
     cmp  expand_, $0
     jne  L11
L5:
     cmp  si, -2(bp)
     ja   L8
     cmpb (si), $10
     jne  L20003
     cmpb -1(si), $13
     je   L20003
     mov  bx, di
     inc  di
     movb (bx), $13
L20003:
     movb al, (si)
     cbw
     movb (di), al
     inc  si
     inc  di
     jmp  L5
L11:
     cmp  si, -2(bp)
     ja   L8
     cmpb (si), $10
     jne  L12
     cmpb -1(si), $13
     je   L12
     mov  bx, di
     inc  di
     movb (bx), $13
L20006:
     movb al, (si)
     cbw
     movb (di), al
     jmp  L13
L12:
     cmpb (si), $9
     jne  L20006
     mov  outgoing_, di
     mov  ax, $1
     push ax
     call ptabs_
     add  sp, $2
     dec  outgoing_
     mov  ax, outgoing_
     mov  di, ax
L13:
     inc  si
     inc  di
     jmp  L11
L8:
     mov  outgoing_, di
     mov  ax, si
     dec  si
     mov  buff_position_, ax
     mov  sp, bp
     pop  bp
     pop  di
     pop  si
     ret



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list