Clarification needed on Pointers/Arrays
Ray Butterworth
rbutterworth at watmath.waterloo.edu
Fri Mar 3 01:28:34 AEST 1989
In article <11914 at haddock.ima.isc.com>, karl at haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:
> I understand that array
> copy was not added at the same time only because they couldn't find a clean
> way to fit it into the existing language. The invention of prototypes did
> provide a (relatively) clean path, but unfortunately X3J11 didn't take it.
That's a bit of an understatement.
Not only didn't they take the path,
they demolished it so that no one else could ever take it in the future.
I've never heard a good explaination of why they thought it necessary
to take this action though.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list