value of TRUE???

[James C. Benz]

In article <18427 at iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> bobmon at iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (RAMontante) writes:
>jcbst3 at unix.cis.pittsburgh.edu (James C. Benz) <16575 at cisunx.UUCP> :
>-
>-if (a=3) will evaluate to true, since the value of (a=3) is 3, a non-zero value
>-Now, if you had said, if (a == 3), it is highly dependent on the value of 3.
>
>How TRUE, how TRUE.... I once knew a mathematician (okay, a statistician)
>who was quite disturbed by the limit of "pi/2" for small values of 2.

OOPS!  How'd that get in there?  Meant to say "a", not "3" - just another
example of brain-damage from too much sillycon in my diet.  Got to stop
eating so many chips.


-- 
Jim Benz 		     jcbst3 at unix.cis.pittsburgh.edu     If a modem 
University of Pittsburgh					 answers,
UCIR			     (412) 648-5930			 hang up!