Abandon NULL for (0)
Steve Mawer
scm at datlog.co.uk
Tue Oct 3 22:19:35 AEST 1989
In article <1005 at kim.misemi> kim at kim.misemi (Kim Letkeman) writes:
> [stuff about using "(0)" instead of "NULL" making programs harder to
> read and maintain]
> I also did not like the
>original author's tendency to write the NULL first in a comparison
>(e.g. if (NULL == some_ptr)) because this obscures the fact that the
>pointer is the object of interest. The value for which you are
>comparing is secondary (although important.)
I also find this comparison ordering unpleasant, but (silver lining!)
it is a convenient way of finding those irritating moments when you've
mistyped "==" as "=".
--
Steve C. Mawer <scm at datlog.co.uk> or < {backbone}!ukc!datlog!scm >
Voice: +44 1 863 0383 (x2153)
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list