MS C vs Turbo C

[Mats Luthman]

In article <2136 at cbnewsl.ATT.COM> daved at cbnewsl.ATT.COM (david.dougherty,sf,) writes:
>Company; I also bought the source.  Now, TeX and METAFONT are very large
>programs.  Turbo C choked.  MSC 5.1 compiled it without so much as a

Exactly what do you mean when you say 'choked'? My experience is that
Turbo C works. I have only dealt with MSC 4.0, and that was a complete
joke. 'Expression too complicated' and 'Macro expansion too long' all
the time where Turbo C compiled everyting fine (and many times faster
too).