ambiguous ?

[Blair P. Houghton]

In article <2446 at cbnewsl.ATT.COM> feg at clyde.ATT.COM writes:
>In article <14110 at lanl.gov>, jlg at lanl.gov (Jim Giles) writes:
>> From article <11388 at smoke.BRL.MIL>, by gwyn at smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn):
>> > One can learn to exploit them (or, in your case, perhaps, simply
>> > to deal with them), but discussion about whether what is, should
>> > be, are a waste of time.
>> 
>> Why?  Is C set in concrete?  What about C++ ???   How about (C++)++ ?
>> Why are you so defensive about possible change - maybe even improvement?
>
>Hey! Maybe it's time to talk about adding pointers again. (;-)

I've even got the semantics worked out.  ( A :-) for effect, and
a :-| because it's _absolutely_true_)

				--Blair
				  "It's on a post-it note
				   ...SOMEwhere around here..."