Abandon NULL for (0)

Richard O'Keefe ok at cs.mu.oz.au
Sat Oct 7 19:25:02 AEST 1989


In article <16178 at vail.ICO.ISC.COM>, rcd at ico.ISC.COM (Dick Dunn) writes:
> NULL should never need to be defined as 0L.

Right on!  _Please_ don't do that; there _are_ machines with 64-bit
"long"s and 32-bit pointers, you know.  [Well, at least one, anyway.]



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list