ambiguous ?

[Richard O'Keefe]

In article <14123 at lanl.gov>, jlg at lanl.gov (Jim Giles) writes:
: From article <2520 at munnari.oz.au>, by ok at cs.mu.oz.au (Richard O'Keefe):
: > This is what it _means_ to exploit the mathematical properties of "and"
: > as Giles recommends.
 
: This is false, since I haven't _made_ a recommendation on this issue.

I apologise for misrepresenting Giles on this issue.  Unfortunately,
I haven't been keeping copies of his articles, so I was unable to quote
him accurately.  He did, however, at one stage, attack "&&" and "||".