Fortran vs. C for numerical work (SUMMARY)
Dan Salomon
salomon at ccu.umanitoba.ca
Sat Dec 1 05:30:32 AEST 1990
In article <9458:Nov2721:51:5590 at kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>
>> 5. There are many numerical libraries written for Fortran.
>
>Which, given f2c, is no longer an issue.
Does f2c handle conformant arrays properly?
If so, is the code that it generates maintainable?
I remember once trying to translate a FORTRAN fast-fourier analysis
procedure into PL/I. Sounds like a piece of cake, right? The problem
was that the FORTRAN procedure accepted arrays with not only any size
of dimensions, but also with any number of dimensions. I devised a way of
doing it, but my method crashed the version of the PL/I compiler that
IBM was distributing at the time (circa 1972), got stuck in the operating
system, and the O/S had to be brought down by the operators to get it
deleted.
--
Dan Salomon -- salomon at ccu.UManitoba.CA
Dept. of Computer Science / University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2 / (204) 275-6682
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list