not again! :-O (now: Please disregard previous posting)

[Chuck Phillips]

Our machine hadn't recieved Chris Torek's posting which explains the context
in which 'float arrf[3];something=&arrf;' makes sense, when I made my ':-0'
posting.

Thanks for the explanation, Chris.  I apologise to Michael, Gary and Chris
for any misunderstandings.  I promise to order my own copy of the standard.
Followups to alt.whoops.
--
	   Chuck Phillips -- chuckp%bach.ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.COM