C strongly typed?
Charles Hannum
CMH117 at psuvm.psu.edu
Mon Mar 12 18:03:39 AEST 1990
In article <14318 at cbnewsc.ATT.COM>, lgm at cbnewsc.ATT.COM (lawrence.g.mayka) says:
>
>Despite the syntax, 'void *' has no semantic connection to 'void'
>at all as far as I can see. Indeed, they are almost opposites:
>"anything" vs. "nothing." Apparently, C compiler writers simply
>decided to apply some new semantics to whatever unused syntax was
>lying around.
As they did, but less effectively, with the keyword "static".
Virtually,
- Charles Martin Hannum II "Klein bottle for sale ... inquire within."
(That's Charles to you!) "To life immortal!"
cmh117 at psuvm.{bitnet,psu.edu} "No noozzzz izzz netzzzsnoozzzzz..."
c9h at psuecl.{bitnet,psu.edu} "Mem'ry, all alone in the moonlight ..."
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list