C strongly typed?
Jim Giles
jlg at lambda.UUCP
Sat Mar 10 09:43:04 AEST 1990
In article <11007 at june.cs.washington.edu>, machaffi at fred.cs.washington.edu (Scott MacHaffie) writes:
- In article <14262 at lambda.UUCP> jlg at lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles) writes:
- %Yes C is strongly typed - by the definition of 'strong typing'. The
- %phrase 'strong typing' means that the type of any object in an scope
- %can be determined at compile time. So, in the example you gave, it is
-
- You just described "static typing".
Yes, I did. The two term are synonymous. English _does_ have this
annoying habbit of providing more than one word for a given meaning.
This is even true in technical jargon.
The fact is that strong/weak typing is defined (at least in the language
design field) as the distinction between compile-time and run-time type
specification. If you prefer 'static' to 'strong' that is your choice.
J. Giles
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list