scope of malloc

[Dan Bernstein]

In article <2229 at kraftbus.opal.cs.tu-berlin.de> net at tubopal.UUCP (Oliver Laumann) writes:
> In what way did the program fragment in my article qualify as spaghetti
> code?  Do you regard "callback functions" as a tangled control structure
> or an unstructured branching construct (in this case you must really
> hate X11 :-)

As callback functions and object-oriented programming are essentially
equivalent, I'd be amused to see the former declared ``unstructured.''

---Dan