Assignment in test: OK?
Karl Heuer
karl at haddock.ima.isc.com
Wed Sep 19 10:30:07 AEST 1990
I suppose that using `:=' would resolve% the problem, in much the same way
that the key-jamming problem was resolved by inventing the pessimal QWERTY.
Karl W. Z. Heuer (karl at kelp.ima.isc.com or ima!kelp!karl), The Walking Lint
________
% I can hardly call it a `fix'. For me, typing `=' for `==' is no more likely
than typing `==' for `=' (which I *have* done at least once), and the cure
would be worse than the disease. `:=' is almost as clumsy to type as that
stupid regexp notation `\( \)'.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list